Playing by the rules

Dear Editor,

In childhood, we learn rules on what is permissible and what is not. We learn rules on handling sharp objects and crossing streets. We learn that games have rules and that violating rules is not an acceptable way to win. Eventually, we learn the Constitution provides the rules governing our country, that the President, members of Congress and judges take oaths to follow those rules and that the President specifically, “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed…”.

In his first 100 days in office, President Trump signed 145 executive orders directing officials in the executive branch to take or stop actions related to policy or management.

Hundreds of lawsuits were filed challenging the legality of these executive orders. At least 185 courts issued rulings that temporarily paused these executive orders or, in many cases found President Trump’s actions were unconstitutional or otherwise illegal. These rulings were rendered by judges appointed by seven different presidents, including President Trump. The legality of many of President Trump’s subsequent executive orders is also being challenged in the courts.

President Trump has reacted with vitriolic attacks on individual judges and denunciations of the Federalist Society and Leonard Leo for providing the candidates for the judiciary which he appointed who are now ruling against his executive orders. This rhetoric has given rise to an unprecedented number credible threats to the safety of our judges, their families and staffs.

Apparently, not everyone believes that rules were made to be followed.

Robert B. Covi

Bogart